We need a Manifesto.for a Human Future

The End of the Human Era is nigh. Or so we are told by what seems like a consensus of those who have done the most thinking about where the trajectory of AI is headed.

We should know the story by now: as soon as only a generation away AI, that product of human intelligence, on which we have become more and more dependent, will transcend and replace human intelligence. As more intelligent and competent in everything, it will start running things. Or something like that. The Human Era will give way to the Transhuman.

This will not be an extension of the human era, like the present but with ever cleverer and more capable Siris and Alexas at our beck and call. According to the late Stephen Hawking, “Once humans develop artificial intelligence, it will take off on its own and redesign itself at an ever-increasing rate.” Taking off on its own, it might, for instance, come up with the brilliant solution to cancer of simply eliminating the outmoded, vulnerable creature for whom cancer (or climate change) is a problem.

The whole point of AI is that it will, as a more powerful intelligence, be self-programming, no longer governed by our inferior, merely human intelligence. That’s why it’s being called the End of Human Era. Exactly what will happen to us is unclear, but some version of obsolete, retired, or killed—roughly, what happened to the Neanderthals when we homo sapiens came along.

It shouldn’t be all wild conjecture to us. We are far enough down the slippery slope to suggest plausibility. The unintended consequences of the digitalization of life are among the big stories of the past year —the hacking of elections and other threats to democracy, the Big Brother factor as we load our lives with potential spies in the form of ever more sophisticated and seductive devices; screens taking over the hearts and minds of our children and skewing social life in general.

The amazing thing is that although this technological end-time on the near horizon is hardly a secret we are apparently so cool with it. We see no Extinction Rebellion demonstrating against extinction by AI.

The very idea of handing over the future to our genius digital progeny suggests to this human the need for a Manifesto for a Human Future, if only to explain to ourselves why we shouldn’t go gently into that dubious future. It would seem that we have apparently reached the point in human history when we actually need to make a case for a human future, rather than a transhuman one.

A manifesto would start with asserting our basic responsibility and obligation not to commit suicide by AI. The human experiece as an embodied creature with its limits and vulnerability is the source of human meaning. For us there is, and can be, no meaning outside human, body-based meaning. We oppose delegating the future to technology, even if the product of human genius, that will not share our situation. The very thing that makes computers superior, their lack of a vulnerable body, is what disqualifies them to make decisions for embodied creatures.

Humans have done and continue to do terrible things to the earth, to other creatures, to ourselves. But we have also done things that seem to us, at least, wonderful. And we must not delegate the authority to make the crucial distinction between baby and bathwater.

If transhumanism is where AI is headed, we should stop developing it.

Resisting technological change has long had a reputation for being both foolish and futile. Technology has been more or less synonymous with progress; we have had no right to oppose it. We here assert that it is not Luddism (that oft-ridiculed resistance to machinery) to recognize that sometimes progress means rejecting the latest technology.

Adaptability, often said to be among our most important traits, is overrated. Especially adaptability to new technologies. (Our current second thoughts about nuclear power and plastics come to mind.)

The truism “Change is inevitable” is both cynical and irresponsible in making it sound like change itself is an agent. We are here and must decide about the human future based on our own sense of the meaning of human life.

Thus a stab at a very rough draft of the basics of a Manifesto for a Human Future.

Artificial Christmas trees unclear on the concept

I read a newspaper story a some months back about the movement to boost the sales of real Christmas trees. I hadn’t known real trees were in need of boosting. I was shocked to learn that almost everybody but us (and everyone we know) has a fake one. 75-80 per cent is what the AP […]

Organized crime north and south of the border

“When you know there are babies tied in a car seat that are burning because of some twisted evil that’s in this world, it’s just hard to cope with that,” ( –a cousin of the victims quoted in the New York Times story on the recent cartel massacre in northern Mexico of six children and […]

Facebook: platform or publisher?

On the slippery slope to AI a debate rages these days about whether Facebook and other social media platforms are in fact platforms or publishers. A platform, like the physical raised stage whence the metaphor derives, it is a completely neutral enabler of communication, like the printing press or telephone. We don’t blame the podium, […]

Hey or Hi? Going with the flow of language ; or not

Those of us of a certain age have had to cope with many changes in the language we inherited. I myself feel pretty proud of how I’ve rolled with the punches. After a couple of decades of going through whatever contortions were needed to avoid splitting an infinitive, I learned how to split one without […]

Can healthcare as a human right and insurance companies co-exist?

Until now I’ve never found election debates sufficiently entertaining to actually watch them. They always seemed to bring out the worst in what otherwise might be perfectly decent human beings. But I must say I’m finding these Democratic debates compelling (if too long by half). A lot has to do with the political moment: Which […]

Wealth tax: How else correct the plunge to oligarchy?

A recent New York Times story on Senator Warren’s proposed tax on the very wealthy notes that polls show it to be a popular idea among those it is intended to benefit. But some economists worry that a 2% tax on family wealth over $50 million(or 3% over $100 million) will remove incentives for growth. […]

Slavery reparations: because bygones are not bygone

On a recent cross country road trip my wife and I stayed overnight in Memphis. Memphis was not our destination. We had booked an Airbnb there because it was conveniently located about halfway between Oklahoma City and Asheville. I didn’t have slavery on my mind. It had escaped my attention that reparations had once again […]

Local opposition to state bike path plan being ignored by leaders

Wellfleet citizens have been in a struggle with the state over a controversial plan to extend the existing Rail Trail to an already congested stretch of Route 6. The plan has been widely opposed by local citizens as dangerous as well as inconsistent with the idea of a scenic and peaceful bike trail. So it […]

Non-residents’ push for the vote: what’s at stake

Outer Cape non-resident taxpayers have clamored ever more loudly in recent years to be able to vote in the town where they own a house, as well as where they live. A recent My View by the president of the Provincetown Part-time Resident Taxpayers Association spells out the argument: to deny secondhome owners a say […]