The Globe is wrong on nuclear power

The Boston Globe has recently been throwing its editorial weight behind nuclear power. It laments the scheduled closing of Pilgrim in June, claiming that the only serious response to climate change is nuclear power. In encouraging a renaissance in this moribund industry it joins the strange bedfellow of president Trump, who enthusiastically supports both nuclear power and coal.

The Globe’s argument is the familiar two-part pro-nukes one. First, nuclear energy is a clean energy source and thus an important ally in the fight against climate change.

Second, wind, solar and other renewables will never be able to supply enough electricity to replace dirty fuels and so are not a serious response to climate change.

These claims have been often refuted. First, nuclear power is not the carbon footprint-free technology it may appear to be. It does have a carbon footprint from uranium mining and processing, transportation, plant construction and operation, and nuclear waste management. It is a considerable improvement over traditional fuels, but many times dirtier than genuine renewables such as solar and wind.

Globe editorials also ignore the 1000 pound elephant of the discussion: the failure, many decades in, to solve the achilles heel of this technology, the disposal of waste, which remains lethal into the distant future.

It is estimated that it would take 1500 to 2000 new nuclear reactors worldwide (compared with fewer than 400 at present), a new reactor every two weeks for the next 60 years at a cost of trillions, to make a meaningful dent in greenhouse emissions with a corresponding quantum leap in the disposal problem.

See the documentary with the ironic title “Containment” for a dystopic view of how it will be living into and beyond the forseeable future when, with many times the reactors we have now, every place in the world would be a nuclear backyard.

And of course there will, inevitably, be more Chernobyls, more Fukushimas.

Second, the Globe position belittles the accelerating progress renewables such as solar and wind have made, despite half-hearted government support (as contrasted with the subsidized nuclear industry. ) Whole nations (Spain, Germany, Italy, etc.) have committed to a nuclear-free future , eschewing the technology or replacing existing reactors with renewables.

But no question, although nuclear power in this country has flatlined for decades and the upward trajectory of renewables is inspirational, there is a struggle for the energy future. Many plants have gone off-line (and of course our own Pilgrim planned for closure in June), but recently a couple of new ones planned. There is talk of a “nuclear renaissance,” which has received a boost from the Trump administration. But also recent polls have for the first time shown public opinion substantially against the construction of new nuclear plants.

We should not underestimate the power of sheer will (political and otherwise), information, and ideas in determining the course of the struggle. Is there any doubt that in California, which recently voted to shut down its last nuclear plant, the progressive intention to achieve 100% renewables, power plants that neighbors don’t fear, will give it the best short at bringing about that future?

In contrast, in neighboring Arizona (the sunniest state in the nation) a ballot measure in November to commit to 50% renewables by 2030 was defeated, leaving in place the current goal of 15% by 2025, in large measure due to an all-out effort of the local power company.

Self-fulfilling prophecies work both ways.

The Globe is the most influential newspaper in an area which, in the fight to close Pilgrim, has become one of the most progressive in the nation when it comes to the energy future. It is really too bad that it has chosen to become part of the problem rather than part of the solution–on the wrong side of tech history.


The Cape Cod National Seashore and our no-frills president

“National parks struggle to stay open,” went the headline of a recent story about effects of the federal government shutdown, which at this writing is close to the end of its third week. Trump has said that for all he cares, the shutdown can go o n for months, even years. Become the new normal, […]


Resisting the AI future?

What will become of us? How technology is changing what it means to be human” is the title of a recent issue of the New York Times Magazine. Something about the helplessness of that plaintive question says a lot about our situation when it comes to the computerization of life and AI (artificial intelligence). Two […]


If it can’t happen here, why not?

“It can’t happen here.” Since Trump was elected, we’ve heard this phrase a lot, with its ironic message of Oh yes it can. In fact it might be happening even as we speak. (And we, frogs in slowly heated water, have just gotten used to it.) So what’s the “it” that we’d like to think […]


The crazy-making premise of Veterans Day

The recent Veterans Day got more media notice than usual as the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day, its earlier form, created to commemorate the ending of World War One. That war was demoted to just another world war from the “Great War” when it turned out not to be the “war to end all wars.” […]


Contradictions of our modern romance of the ocean

There was an emotional gathering at Newcomb Hollow beach in Welllfleet in October to celebrate the life of the young man killed by a shark. Part of it was a “paddle-out” of dozens of surfers to form a circle. It took some guts to go out there, I thought, well beyond warnings on the posted […]


The logic of not voting. And of voting.

For as long as I can remember, a theme of civic life has been the scandalously low voter turnout in national elections. On average 40% of eligible voters don’t vote in presidential elections, about 60% in off-years. A curious phenomenon, this failure to vote–to exercise the most basic right in what we think of as […]


The shark crisis: speciesism vs. ecological altruism

In response to the shark fatality crisis, Wellfleet’s selectboard scheduled what was called by some a Shark Town Meeting. It filled the elementary school gym to overflowing, maybe half again the number of attendees as at the Special Town Meeting earlier the same week. After preliminary statements from town officials and shark experts, the meeting […]


Contradictions of shark romance

“We all knew this day would come” ran the big front page headline about the fatal shark attack in Wellfleet. Well, actually, no, we didn’t. Six deaths annually worldwide on average (and first fatality in Massachusetts in 82 years) is pretty good odds Sure, those odds rise when you eliminate all the people who don’t […]


Crazy poor Americans

Can we talk about “Crazy Rich Asians”? We crazy, poor Americans are turning out in crazy numbers to see this movie, whose exotic opulence transcends its cliched romantic comedy plot. The movie seems fresh, not just in its all-Asian cast, but in widening our continent-locked, monolinguistic diversity horizon. The plot takes us to Singapore, where […]