Covid Craziness: conundrums and contradictions

This past year of the pandemic has frequently been referred to as a “crazy time.” Crazy not just because we’ve had to live and work in unprecedented ways, but also crazy in the sense of puzzling, contradictory–crazy-making.

A mantra from the first has been the sensible-sounding advice to “follow the science” and listen to the experts. But the science hasn’t always been clear and the experts have changed their minds and disagreed with each other.

From the start there have been issues, some of the most basic, you’ve had to deal with on your own, puzzles you’ve had to puzzle out by yourself.

For starters: how bad is it? Early on virtually every news story included the information that the “vast majority” of cases were mild. Vast majority to me means something like 95%. It seemed a distinct “not to worry” on the part of experts.

But what made the news were symptoms that sounded anything but mild. Even in what seemed like mild cases, there are longterm life-alterating effects. I just read a normally trusted source say that 35% of cases have of longterm effects. I can’t remember when that “vast majority” assurance disappeared from news stories.

Masks have bee seen, unequivocally, as essential and effective—and sufficient– for flattening the curve. But in January suddenly wearing two masks was touted as a big improvement over a single mask, implying that in fact masks have not been largely effective, as we had been reading. Really?

Six feet was given from the start as the necessary and sufficient distance we have to stay apart from each other. Where this practice is maintained (and masks worn where six feet is not possible, as in stores), the virus will disappear, the curve will do down.

But you still see people wearing masks even on remote trails and even with the mask in passing the unmasked (because in the great outdoors) hiker, detouring to achieve 15 or 20 feet. Are they confused on the concept or listening to other experts?

What seems the basic logic of lockdowns as a method of distancing has been called into question by stories reporting that California, a state with strict statewide lockdowns (Disneyland closed) and Florida with no statewide restrictions (Disney World left open since July) have have experienced almost identical outcomes in COVID-19 case rates.

One of the biggest puzzles of all is why some of the poorest countries–much of sub-Saharan Africa, for instance–have a tiny fraction of the cases and deaths of rich countries such as the U.S., Germany, France, etc. that logic would assume would be better prepared to deal with a pandemic.

In A recent article in the New Yorker a respected physician, Siddhartha Mukherjee, goes over some possible answers to the mystery—climate, younger population, inaccurate reporting, etc.–and concludes that although an answer would seem to be basic to understanding this virus, it remains a mystery.

The “Cure worse than the disease” argument rages on. The standoff seems resolved as a false dichotomy by a University of Chicago economist who proposed what he called “the first rule of virus economics”: “The best way to fix the economy is to get control of the virus. ” Until the virus is under control, people will be afraid to resume normal life and the economy would not function normally. This rule would seem to be borne out by the apparent failure of the Swedish experiment of keeping the economy open while protecting the most vulnerable.

Surely as a society we will want to have a convincing statistical sorting out of this fundamental issue.

And now that we are vaccinating in serious numbers, and may be (or not) on the way to herd immunity, the vaccine mandate becomes an issue. Can the large number (up to 30%) disinclined to get vaccinated be legally required to do so? Getting a potent substance injected into your arm would seem to be a matter to be left to individual decision. But if my health and happiness depend on your getting with the program to reach 70% or whatever the number is to reach herd immunity, won’t I be willing to overrule your personal feelings as I would with your personal decision to drive drunk?

You don’t have to be an expert to notice is that there is much about this virus and how to live with it that that eludes us, including the experts. The most thoughtful expertise seems to suggest that it is naïve and illogical to imagine that our species will ever transcend our vulnerability to such primitive and ancient diseases. We may be coming to understand that we who live in bodies will have to live with such diseases as we live with the weather.


Covid one year ago: the individual and the herd

On March 12th of last year covid-19 had its first practical effect on my life when I went to a drugstore to buy a card for my wife’s birthday. A woman was standing in front of the card rack making her selection. Hmmm , I thought, maybe I better wait til she’s through, and bided […]


Government, liberty, and our founding paradox

David Lesh, a colorful self-promoter, posted on Instagram a photo of himself defecating into a hitherto pristine Colorado lake, crowing about the wonderful feeling of freedom he got from it. Then, when faced with charges, he claimed that, actually, he had faked the photo. As he put it to a reporter, “I want to be […]


How big is the iceberg? (or, How big is Trump’s army?)

How can a country united in a Super Bowl Sunday be in trouble? Didn’t we all come together , Americans of every stripe, Trump and Biden supporters, election believers and deniers, BLM and white supremacists alike, to celebrate the cleverest commercials and to focus on nothing more divisive than whether the old or the young […]


Healing the wound of election denial

So what to do about election denialism, the widespread claims that the election was stolen? If polls are right, something like 50 million fellow citizens, almost all of them Republicans, believe the election was stolen. That’s a lot of healing to do. Will polls show that Biden’s passionate and convincing plea in his inaugural address […]


How big is Trump’s army?

Newspaper stories, TV and online sources have had little on the size of the mob that stormed the Capitol on January 6th or the crowd outside and what there is seems wildly varied and unreliable. A recent AP story on inauguration security says “.. thousands of supporters of President Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol…” I […]


Cape Trump enablers bear responsibility

What a thing: the president himself, turned instigator-in-chief, siccing a mob on the nation’s capitol. Running real time on TV. As coup d’etats go it was pretty pathetic and ragtag. more notable for the inadequacy of the police who allowed it than for what it was. Reporters and the besieged lawmakers of both parties called […]


Cross-country road trip a source of comfort in a divided nation

In the Deming, New Mexico, La Quinta motel on I -10 the friendly young woman behind the main desk was named Paris. When my wife asked her whether she had ever been to Paris, she replied that actually, she had. “And it smelled like pee.” Try to figure out the politics of that. In early […]


How do Trump supporters read the traditional Christmas stories?

During the holiday season in a typical presidential election year we are, those of both parties, getting used to the idea of a new presidency, of being, if grudgingly, united in the acceptance of the person we’ve democratically elected to head the country for the next four years. This year,of course, it’s the opposite. The […]


Common ground and the self-evident truths of democracy

“We are not enemies, we are Americans.” In president-elect Biden’s passionate plea for healing he suggests that simply being Americans should be the common ground on which we can all come together. But given the circumstances, we Americans being so harshly divided on so many things, perhaps we could get a little less vague. In […]